Benchmarks that give you a baseline, not a leaderboard
Most engineering benchmarks fail in one of two ways: they compare you to an anonymous industry average you cannot inspect, or they hand managers a single number that is trivially easy to game. FeatureFactory takes the opposite stance - a benchmark should be a transparent baseline you can interrogate, not a leaderboard that quietly changes behavior for the worse.
The first and most important baseline is your own trailing history. Comparing this quarter to last quarter, on the same repositories with the same team shape, tells you far more than landing in an external band on a given week. External ranges like the DORA Elite/High/Medium/Low bands add context, but we treat them as reference lines, not report cards.
Because every benchmark exposes the signals underneath it - the pull requests, commits, reviews, and deploys - you can always trace a number back to the work that produced it. That traceability is what makes the comparison worth trusting. Start from the raw signals in engineering metrics and layer benchmarks on top.