Comparison
FeatureFactory vs LinearB: pricing compared
LinearB meters some usage in credits and sells higher tiers sales-assisted. FeatureFactory publishes flat per-seat pricing you can read before you commit.
The short version
LinearB lists tiered plans but meters usage in credits (around 100 per PR), so effective cost scales with PR volume and higher tiers are sales-assisted. FeatureFactory prices flat per seat and publishes every tier: Solo is free forever, Team is $49 per developer per month, and line-level AI-vs-human attribution is included in the base price. Confirm LinearB's current numbers on their site; ours are on the pricing page.
Why teams pick FeatureFactory
Flat per seat, not credits
LinearB meters some usage in credits at roughly 100 per pull request, which makes spend hard to forecast as PR volume grows. FeatureFactory publishes flat per-seat pricing - $49 per developer per month on Team - so cost stays predictable no matter how many PRs you ship.
A number without a demo
You can read every FeatureFactory tier on the pricing page and start on a 14-day self-serve trial. There is no sales call required to find out what it costs.
AI measurement in the base price
Line-level AI-vs-human attribution and quality scoring are included in the Team tier, not sold as a separate add-on. LinearB measures AI adoption at the PR level; the finer attribution is the differentiator you are paying for.
A free tier that actually measures
The Solo tier is free forever for one developer and one repository, with real PR, commit and DORA measurement - not a locked trial. You can prove value before anyone signs a contract.