Skip to main content
FeatureFactory

AI Agent Observability

See what your coding agents actually shipped.

Trace every AI agent run to the pull request it produced and whether that code held up in production.

Trace every agent run

Follow each coding agent from prompt to merged PR, capturing the diffs, files, and decisions it produced along the way.

PR-level attribution

Know exactly which pull requests were authored or co-authored by an agent, so shipped code is never a black box.

Production hold-up signals

Link agent-written changes to incidents, rollbacks, and revert commits to see whether the code actually survived production.

Quality over time

Watch review depth, change failure rate, and rework trend per agent so you can tell improvement from regression.

Cost per shipped feature

Attribute token spend and run time to the features that reached production, not just to raw agent activity.

One dashboard, every tool

Unify Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot, and custom agents into a single observability surface instead of scattered logs.

You cannot manage what your agents ship in the dark

Coding agents now open real pull requests, refactor real modules, and touch production paths - but most teams only see the chat transcript, not the consequences. A run that "looks successful" can still introduce a regression that surfaces days later as an incident or a quiet revert.

AI agent observability closes that gap. Instead of trusting a green checkmark at the end of a run, you trace every agent-authored change to the pull request it produced and the production behavior that followed. That means you can answer the questions that actually matter: what did this agent ship, did it get reviewed, and did it hold up?

FeatureFactory builds this view from the artifacts you already have. If you want the fuller picture of attribution across the lifecycle, start with how we measure AI-generated code.

From agent runs to production outcomes

Raw agent logs tell you what happened inside a model call. They do not tell you whether the feature worked. Observability worth having connects the two - mapping each run to its diffs, its reviewers, its CI results, and the incidents or reverts that came after.

With that chain in place, you can compare agents fairly. Which tool ships code that survives review with fewer round-trips? Which one drives up change failure rate? You can track this per agent and per repo, then fold it straight into your existing DORA metrics and cycle time analytics.

This is the "measure" half of a developer-led factory: plan the work, build it with agents, and observe what actually landed. Explore the full loop on the measure product page.

Related tools & solutions

Frequently asked questions

AI agent observability is the practice of tracing, measuring, and evaluating what autonomous coding agents actually do end to end - from the prompt they received, through the diffs they produced, to whether that code held up once it reached production. It goes beyond raw run logs to connect agent activity with real engineering outcomes like change failure rate, rework, and reverts.

From our design partners

“We finally have one number for whether the AI-written PRs are actually good. It changed how we staff reviews.”
SStaff EngineerSeries B fintech
“Plan from real signal, ship with agents, then see if the metric moved. That loop is the whole point.”
EEng ManagerDeveloper tools
“The measurement is transparent and the code is ours. That was the dealbreaker with the enterprise options.”
VVP EngineeringHealthcare SaaS

Measure what you ship.

Connect one repository and get your first delivery baseline.

Start free